(It's much more than $100 billion, the Rothschild's and friends chartered the Federal Reserve Bank in 1913, U.S. taxpayers were robbed of $400 billion through interest payments to this corrupt institution in 2009 alone.)
Once you understand banking and how it evolved into the fractional reserve fiat system that currently plagues us. You gain a clearer perspective of world events that have occurred through history. There is an untold history that is the full truth, then there is a history we are taught that has small parts of the truth along with fabrications and out right lies.
The people who have controlled the central banks of the world didn't always hide in the shadows. Why do they now hide in the shadows? People who do just and honorable things stand tall in the light. Those who commit crime typically do so under the cover of darkness.
Before I'm crucified for what I have to say. Judge these things for yourselves and seek out the facts.
I know that the Germans didn't like Jews, I learned that in school and I'm reminded everyday when I listen to talk radio and sometimes when I watch the TV. However, why the Germans didn't like the Jews is sort of fuzzy, was it because they looked different or because they where looking for someone to blame their financial hardship on during the Great depression?
Who has controlled central banks across Europe for the last 500 years? What about the new EURO currency? How about the Federal Reserve Note? Who has the power to control money?
Who purchased Israel from Britain?
Who built the Knesset, home of the Israeli Parliament?
Why was there an attempt on President Andrew Jackson life? and why is his gravestone inscribed with "I killed the bank"?
Why was Abraham Lincoln assassinated and who paid the assassin to do it?
Why was President Kennedy killed a week after signing a law that challenged the power of the Federal Reserve to print money?
Could big media be lying to you?
Wouldn't it take lots of money to buy all these television stations and newspapers?
Who has lots of money?
and again, why do crooks hide in the shadows?
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." -Thomas Jefferson
"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning. " -Henry Ford
To that I'd like to add that the Rothschild international Jewish banking family didn't always hide in the shadows as they do today. They used to flaunt their ill gotten wealth and rub it in the face of the world. Since they ran and still run the central banks of the world it was easy to figure out who caused the first Great Depression. The people that control the money....Duh..... These same criminals run the Federal Reserve and are working towards a one world currency. They hide behind the Jewish religion and use it as a shield to discredit anyone who criticises them. The Rothschild's purchased Israel from Britain in the 1940's and set up a "Jewish" state....It's a front.
People with no moral barometer will do anything and step on anyone to get what they want. That is why the biggest scumbags end up in positions of power.
I've been getting email on the National Strike posting, this is great! I'm going to put up a couple with my responces. Please take a minute to fill out the survey at the top of the page just under The Marble Bag logo. Web newz is at the bottom of the post, thanks alot! :-D
From: J Subject: RE: A RESPONCE TO: National Strike - To: "'pete pan'" Date: Friday, April 16, 2010, 5:57 AM
Dear Pan,
As we both know, you and I often disagree over political issues, too. For instance, I truly believe that George Bush is a man of great integrity, and I like Sarah Palin (though have never been a McCain fan). I wouldn’t support Palin for president, though, because I think experience is critical to doing the job well – experience and the ability to surround ones self with good advisors.
I am a conservative, politically.
We often agree, though, too. And your response to this guy was spot on – imagine actually using the Constitution and the founding fathers’ words as a defense of your beliefs? Brilliant! – and rare. Good for you.
Probably the most important thing we agree on is this: we are being divided as a people by an ideological machine, neither wing of which fully or accurately represents We the People. But because we are so faithful to those sides, we resort to name-calling and contempt, and never hear what the other fellow really has to say. Wouldn’t it be nice if we could hear a person speak without first ascertaining whether there was an R or a D after his or her name? Wouldn’t it be nice if we could disagree without calling each other silly names like Troglodyte? (Troglodyte: A hermit: one who lives alone in solitude. Huh? What does that have to do with anything?)
At any rate, even though I like Bush and Palin – and Rush Limbaugh and a few others you surely don’t – I appreciate your e-mails and your insight, and your thoughtfulness. You set an example. That we are not each other’s enemy, I completely agree!
J
----- Original Message ----- From: pete pan To: J Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 11:42 AM Subject: RE: A RESPONCE TO: National Strike -
Hi J,
I don't completely agree with Rush but I listen to him regularly on the radio while I work. A lot of what he says is right on, but not always. The things Sara Palin says aren't necessarily wrong but many people disregarded her a long time ago over the way she handles herself, cutting out on her term early, and the way she talks, etc... Although she has some following, she isn't going to unite the country. Many on the left disregard the Tea Party's message because Sara Palin has attempted to take ownership of it. I think we need to find a new candidate who is going to pull people in from both sides. I have a sore spot for her because she got in front of the Tea Party (the peoples party) and pushed many people away because they don't like her politically. People tend to throw out the baby with the bath water.
Anyway I'm now on the ballot for Prescient Delegate! Vote for me in August!
Pano :-)
Re: A RESONCE TO: National Strike April 16, 2010 5:23 PM From: J
Hm. I agree with many of your assessments of Palin. I got a survey call recently where I was asked, "Are you a Tea Party patriot?" I answered yes. I was then asked, "Do you support Sarah Palin?" I answered, "For what?" and the survey ended. It was a recorded survey and I am sure wasn't equipped for something other than yes or no, but the truth is, I can't answer whether I support Sarah Palin without finding that out first. I don't support her for president. I support her right to a platform and I heartily approve of much of what she has to say. I suspect she was a decent governor - she had an 80% approval rating that transcended party lines. But those days ARE gone for her, admittedly. She has become very polarizing.
I will indeed vote for you.
J
Begin forwarded message:
From: a Subject: Fwd: A RESPONCE TO: National Strike - To: "pete pan" Date: Friday, April 16, 2010, 6:33 PM
I sent this guy your reply and this was his response. What's missing from his take is that the Gov. committed 9/11.
A
Begin forwarded message:
From: X
This guy still doesn't get it. It's not what HE THINKS is a constitutional right (or probably what some anti-Obama organization told him to think), it's what the SUPREME COURT SAYS is a constitutional right, no matter how absurd it is. Didn't these people pay attention in high school civics class? Ergo my point that it is vital to elect a president and a supporting congress who will make SC appointments that lean toward the protection of civil rights, not corporate rights. Corporate control of the government , health care reform, restoration of rights, etc., etc., all start with the Supreme Court decisions. My current outrage is on corporate campaign contributions .... AKA the legalization of bribes. I.E. Corporate money is funding the moronic "Tea Party" with millions and outright lies through shill organizations, and the dupes are either too stupid to know, they don't want to know, or they are dishonest about knowing. Sort of like complaining about the frying pan by jumping into the fire. But I say go! go! go! run some candidates and split that repub-corporate vote!
BTW... personal income taxes are lower now than they were under Bush.... go figure.
Cheers, /X
Re: Fwd: A RESPONCE TO: National Strike April 16, 2010 10:11 PM From: "pete pan"
This guy is a tough case. He's right about corporations being involved in government that shouldn't be. He's quick to categorize me into his idea of the republican party for having conservative/ libertarian views. The shape of this cookie looks like NBC to me. I don't disagree with him one bit about the corporations and government being in bed together, of course that's incredibly wrong. You can't set aside the Constitution and put your faith into 9 human beings to do what's right, so few are so easily corrupted with relatively small amounts of money and effort. He must be getting this idea that the tea party is stupid because the elite put Palin in front of it to keep people like him from getting on the band wagon. Contempt before prior investigation is ignorance. It's almost like they've built a protective layer of it around this chap. I'm not mad at him, he's right about alot but like you said he hasn't seen the view through the wide angle lens yet. Both extremes have pieces of the truth but they are kept polarized.
I admit, I listen to AM radio at work. However I still only pull out the good and throw out the rest. I used to hate Rush, but some of what he says is correct. He does go to far with the pro-corporate, pro-war, pro-Zionist message but I recognize it. This guy needs to recognize Obama's the same guy. The national debt is $13,000,000,000,000 and they keep spending. They all work for the bank that prints the money. The deeper in hock we go the more interest the bank makes. I'm glad this guy is happy with taxes now, he'll be really happy when they bring in a VAT.
Maybe you should show him a video of Building 7 and ask him why more money was spent on investigating Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky than investigating 9/11.
PS: I think Massad did it and certain government officials in the know were in on it. Of course we'll never know unless they conduct a proper investigation.
Why is FEMA trying to cover up NLE 10? If the past is any indication of the future we should be afraid, they were running terror training drills on 9/11 too.
I recently asked a young friend what he thought of everything going on in the world. He thinks we should move to a global world currency to replace the dollar.
I hope he's reading. I suggest watching "The Money Masters" videos on youtube. There are 22 of them. It's a couple hours of education, but by the end you'll have a clear understanding of the banking system and a better understanding of world history from the 1500's to the present day. International finance is controlled by a relatively small group of people. These people have been doing it for years and have become very rich and powerful at your expense. You should know about it.
The international financiers would like to impose a one world currency and they are currently creating financial problems to lead us to that end.
First time visitor numbers are down but returning visitors to this blog are up. The numbers are generally pretty low but I'm glad that a few people are enjoying the site. I know that I am. I will try to stay current and post regularly but I can't do it every day. However, if your like me and you can't keep your eyes shut while the train wreck piles up, you've come to the right place. Go through and check out the older content. I've only been seriously posting since last winter so the content isn't even that dusty. (a good amount of it is always relevant) .
Please interact, post comments, suggestions, and hate mail....
It seems like America now only exists in history books. Everything that is happening right now is wrong, but when you flip around your perspective, cross your eyes a bit and think like a tyrant you can understand why.
The next logical step is to shut down the Internet. They can't have us freely sharing information with each other and realizing the full scope of his worldwide scam. I would expect these world government types to conduct a false flag Internet event, paint "terrorism" on it, and shut down all access to real information pretty soon. The 9/11 cat is out of the bag, more people wake up everyday and can see right through the lies. We are reaching a critical mass. The states are beginning to push back. The liars are chasing their tail trying to cover all this up. They need another shock and awe distraction to disrupt the developing culture and cut off the supply of information not under their control.
We are dealing with the same old run of the mill greed the world has dealt with for centuries. They think the same old tired crap they've always thought. Not that they're listening, but I do have some free advise. You'll never hold onto control through aggression and brute force, you make way to many enemies. Your not much of a leader if people curse you under their breath. If you did something REALLY great, who wouldn't want to stand with you? If you did something to benefit everyone on this rock we'd all move together. You'll never get someone to put their heart into it out of fear. A house built on lies and corruption will fall. Your time at the top will be limited.
Here are a few more good sites recently shared with me:
Action alert! Fed gets new oversight powers under Dodd billThe last thing we should do is give this currupt institution more power! Tell your congressmen and senators to support Ron Pauls bill to Audit the FED! Damn good for nothing prostitutes.
Read this article: The Last HopeI really like what the author says here. I'll move to any state that respects my personal freedom. Laws written that violate the constitution aren't laws, just words on paper. The constitution says any power not specifically designated to Washington belongs to the states and the people.
Cass Sunstein, a Harvard law professor, co-wrote an academic article entitled "Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures," in which he argued that the government should stealthily infiltrate groups that pose alternative theories on historical events via "chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine" those groups. As head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Sunstein is in charge of "overseeing policies relating to privacy, information quality, and statistical programs," according to the White House Web site.
Sunstein, whose article focuses largely on the 9/11 conspiracy theories, suggests that the government "enlist nongovernmental officials in the effort to rebut the theories. It might ensure that credible independent experts offer the rebuttal, rather than government officials themselves. There is a tradeoff between credibility and control, however. The price of credibility is that government cannot be seen to control the independent experts."
Sunstein "wants to hold blogs and web hosting services accountable for the remarks of commenters on websites while altering libel laws to make it easier to sue for spreading 'rumors
There is an established legal principle that people should not have to repay their government’s debt to the extent that it is incurred to launch aggressive wars or to oppress the people.
These “odious debts” are considered to be the personal debts of the tyrants who incurred them, rather than the country’s debt.
Wikipedia gives a good overview of the principle: Odious Debt
